U.K. CEOs make 143 times more than workers

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

LONDON (CNNMoney) — The pay gap between British workers and their bosses just keeps on getting bigger.

Chief executives of big British companies were paid 143 times their average employee wage in the last financial year, according to the High Pay Center.

That’s up from a ratio of 47 in 1998, but still leaves CEOs lagging their U.S. rivals — who make nearly 300 times on average.

The result is similar to research conducted by Manifest/MM&K, which put the U.K. executive pay ratio for 2012 at 133 times employee pay using a slightly different methodology

Official U.K. figures released last week showed total pay, including bonuses, fell for the first time in five years in the second quarter despite rapid job growth.

And most British workers have been suffering a pay squeeze for much longer, as wages have failed to keep pace with inflation since early 2010.

The High Pay Center average masks a huge range in executive pay across the companies that belong to the benchmark FTSE 100 index.

Nearly half of the companies pay their CEO 100 times their average employee wage, and some several times that.

Martin Sorrell, the boss of the advertising company WPP earns £29.8 million, 780 times his average employee.

At the other end of the spectrum are retailer Sports Direct, with a ratio of just 10, and 3i Group at 16 times.

The research is based on annual pay reports published by the companies, and average employee pay for each firm calculated by Pensions and Investment Research Consultants, which advises institutional investors on corporate governance issues.

The High Pay Center has called on the British government to cap executive pay at a fixed multiple of a company’s lowest paid employee.


  • Edward Pope (@RFRStormer)

    So why is this news? The American CEO’s are making on Average 300x more than the average worker in their respective companies. Some are making up to 890x more. I agree that if investors want to have the company save some real money, that it makes sense to reduce salary in management. But, I know that will never happen, as it always makes sense to pay one guy a lot of money who does only one persons work. If we paid by workload I suspect that the people who are being paid the least will end up making a ton more money than any CEO.

Comments are closed.