Whole Foods pays $800K for overcharging California customers

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

LOS ANGELES – After a statewide investigation found widespread pricing violations at Whole Foods Markets in California, the company has settled with three Southern California cities and agreed to pay $800,000 in civil penalties.

The settlement was announcement Tuesday by the city attorney’s office in Los Angeles, where 10 Whole Foods stores operate. The city attorneys of Santa Monica and San Diego were also part of the lawsuit.

“We’re taking action to assure consumers get what they pay for,” L.A. City Attorney Mike Feuer said in a news release. “No consumer should ever be overcharged by their local market.”

State and county inspectors across California found that the upscale grocery chain was charging “more than the advertised price for a wide variety of food items,” according to Feuer’s office.

Whole Food stores sold packaged items with less product by weight than was indicated on labels, failed to deduct for the weight of containers for food purchased at the salad and hot-food bars, and sold items from the deli counter by the piece instead of by pound, the release stated.

Under the settlement, Whole Foods does not admit guilt, but agrees to charge accurate prices and make multiple changes at all 74 of its California stores for five years.

Whole Foods Market California, Inc. and Mrs. Gooch’s Natural Foods Markets, Inc. — which control stores in Northern and Southern California, respectively — are bound by the terms of a judgment.

The corporations must appoint two statewide coordinators to oversee pricing accuracy at California stores, designate an employee at each store to such accuracy, and conduct audits ensuring pricing and weight accuracy four times per year at each store.

Whole Foods must also pay $630,000 in civil penalties, $100,000 to a statewide consumer protection trust fund, and $68,394 in investigative costs.

Source: KTLA


  • Ron Melancon

    Wake up people we need to do the same in Henrico! I have been overcharged and so have you with the meals taxes! So you have been paying a meals tax on shakes, coffee, iced tea, cookies and even Bagles. I have the receipts and evidence and for some reason nobody is getting upset?

    • athynz

      The meals tax was voted on by the majority of the voters in Henrico County so that is why no one is getting upset about it. Now if an individual restaurant is overcharging the 4% then by all means pursue it with them.

      • Tom C.

        A majority of voters in Henrico did not vote for the meals tax. However, the majority of those who voted approved the meals tax.

      • athynz

        Tom – that is what I said. The majority of the voters. I’m sorry but if one didn’t vote then one does not have the right to gripe about the result. This meals tax issue was in the works for a long time, everyone had ample time to decide which way they wanted to vote and quite frankly if people felt strongly against it they should have gone to the polls. IOW if one didn’t vote one is not a voter.

Comments are closed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.